An Investor's Log, Week 14

The dashboard:


The ChatGPT summary: 

The past week was defined by a reassertion of macro rigidity rather than transition: US labor data surprised decisively to the upside with 172,000 jobs added, reinforcing the view that the US economy is operating in a “low-hire, low-fire” equilibrium rather than a cyclical slowdown. This outcome materially reduced expectations for near-term policy easing and re-anchored global rate expectations around a higher-for-longer path. At the same time, inflation dynamics in both the US and Eurozone remain elevated, with European price pressures continuing to be driven primarily by energy spillovers rather than domestic demand overheating.

The key macro feature is therefore not acceleration, but persistence: inflation is not collapsing, and labor markets are not weakening. This combination has tightened financial conditions through the yield channel without requiring central banks to deliver additional policy shocks. Equity markets have responded through dispersion rather than broad liquidation. The most visible manifestation of this dispersion was a sharp reversal in AI and semiconductor equities, where crowded positioning and duration sensitivity triggered a ~4% drawdown in the NASDAQ despite otherwise stable macro conditions. This reflects a regime in which liquidity sensitivity is increasingly dominant over pure growth narratives.

Energy markets remain a second structural driver. Oil prices near the $90 level continue to embed a geopolitical premium, feeding directly into European inflation persistence and complicating the ECB’s tightening path. The ECB is now effectively committed to additional tightening, but markets are beginning to distinguish between symbolic policy action and marginal macro impact.

Within this environment, your portfolio demonstrated meaningful relative resilience. The approximately -0.5% weekly drawdown versus a materially worse global equity benchmark reflects effective diversification across asset classes and regions. Gold exposure and global bond allocations likely provided convex protection during equity drawdowns, while implicit underweight exposure to concentrated US AI leadership reduced sensitivity to the week’s sharpest risk-off move. The main drag appears to come from growth-sensitive international equities, particularly Japan-linked and consumption-oriented exposures.

The emerging regime is best characterized as a “high-rate, high-volatility, low-directionality” environment, where returns are increasingly generated through allocation structure rather than beta exposure. Portfolio sensitivity to duration (both equity and interest-rate implied) is becoming more important than directional equity exposure itself.

Suggested adjustment: modestly reduce AI-heavy growth exposure while increasing allocation to gold as a structural hedge against persistent inflation and geopolitical energy risk.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Family education is not that important

(translated from my Chinese blog) This is my new project, “Nietzschean Philology”. In each installment, I’ll read a passage from Nietzsche’s original writings. By practicing text analysis, we can enhance our ability to understand the world. The reading of "We Philologists" continues. Section 11 continues the discussion of external factors hindering genius individuals from the previous section, shifting from professional education (unqualified philologists) to family education. It's no surprise that Nietzsche views the importance of family education very lowly; ultimately, there are too few cases where families can provide the life possibilities for geniuses. Let it be considered how differently a science is propagated from the way in which any special talent in a family is transmitted. The bodily transmission of an individual science is something very rare. Do the sons of philologists easily become philologists? Dubito. Thus there is no such accumulation of philological c...
Read more

The value of life depends to a great extent on pure hazard

(translated from my Chinese blog) This is my new project, “Nietzschean Philology”. In each installment, I’ll read a passage from Nietzsche’s original writings. By practicing text analysis, we can enhance our ability to understand the world. "We Philologists" Section 1. Starting from the two main themes of classical linguistics and education, Nietzsche discusses how the specialization of education leads to premature decisions that result in foolish choices in life. He also explores the dilemma of choosing a career: it’s impossible for a person to know what kind of career they should pursue while actually engaging in that career at the same time. As a result, life becomes something determined purely by chance. To what a great extent men are ruled by pure hazard, and how little reason itself enters into the question, is sufficiently shown by observing how few people have any real capacity for their professions and callings, and how many square pegs there are in round holes: happ...
Read more

Can Writing be fun?

 My dear friend suggested, after reading my last post, that writing can have more than one purpose, and what I was arguing, namely writing as a form of thinking, was merely one of the many purposes for writing. For instance, writing can be for remembering; writing can also be for fun. Now I would like to leave the remembering part for the next post. For now, let's talk about fun. Can writing be fun? Yes. But what kind of fun is that? To answer this question, there are basically two approaches, both of which lead to the same conclusion. I will start with the easy approach: the supply side of the fun. Now, what are the things that are mostly considered fun? Entertainments. Movies. Music. Video games. Hanging out with friends. Partying. Sightseeing. Travelling. TikTok. Youtube. Netflix. These things can be placed into an imaginary spectrum, with one side being totally brainless, and the other side requiring some sort of effort. Let's take music for example. Listening to music can ...
Read more